اقتباس:
المشاركة الأصلية كتبت بواسطة معك ولاعة؟
وبالمناسبة مدراش تنحوما ذكر ألوهية الفرعون .
|
نعم.
و ذلك أثناء تفسيره لاية ،جعلتك يا موسي إلها لِفرعون ،و التى رأى فيها تلميحاً لألوهية الفرعون ...
اقتباس:
|
See, I have set thee in God’s stead to Pharaoh (Exod. 7:1). The Holy One, blessed be He, said to Moses: The wicked Pharaoh boasts that he is a god. Make him realize that he is an insignificant being. Indeed, I will make you appear as a god to him. Whence do we know that he claimed to be divine? It is said: My river is mine own, and I have made it for myself (Ezek. 29:3). Therefore, he will look at you and say: “Surely this one is god.”
|
المدراش موجود هنا
https://chosenpeopleanswers.com/Midr...idebarLang=all
أى أن يهوة يقول لموسي : فرعون هذا المُجَدِف المغرور الذى يظن نفسه الها ،سأجعلك عليه إلها .
الموقف العام من العلماء تجاه ذلك المدراش هو الأتى:
encyclopedia.com
اقتباس:
|
Tanḥuma-Yelammedenu literature is best regarded as a particular midrashic genre which began to crystallize toward the end of the Byzantine period in Palestine (5–7th century c.e.), but continued to evolve and spread throughout the Diaspora well into the middle ages
|
يقول (Lerner, The Works of Aggadic Midrash and the Esther Midrashim in "The Literature of the Sages," pp. 149-152).
اقتباس:
|
Midrash Yelammedenu, the precursor to Midrash Tanhuma, was composed c. 400-600 CE. During the seventh to eighth centuries, it is possible numerous segments of the Tanhuma-type midrash have already received their final form". However, it is likely that the final version of Tanhuma was completed around 700-900 CE.
|
The Binding Fragments of Midrash Tanhuma
(Buber) from the Municipal Library of Trier
Andreas Lehnardt
اقتباس:
|
Midrash Tanhuma, a rabbinic commentary to the Torah, is regarded as a rather late composition in comparison to the classical works of Midrash, such as the Halachic Midrashim and the Rabbot Midrashim. The manuscript used by Solomon Buber for his edition is no longer assumed to represent the earliest version of Midrash Tanhuma . Although this recension seems to preserve early traditions—even from the era of the Second Temple—it is most likely that the main body of this recension has been compiled by Ashkenazic Jews in the Middle Ages.1
|
و يقول Marc Bregman,عن مدراش تنحما
فى كتابه
The Tanhuma-Yelammedenu Literature: Studies in the Evolution of the Versions.
الذى فَصًل المسألة
اقتباس:
|
The earliest material developed in Byzantine Palestine around the 5th century. This conclusion is based on linguistic phenomena as well as the question of the historical and cultural milieu in which a given narrative might have developed.
|
Hebrew Union College Annual Volume 88 يقول إصدار
David H. Aaron, Jason Kalman
