[فتحي]

المشاركة الأصلية كتبت بواسطة Skeptic

Peer Review يكون في مجلة متخصصة وليست scam

Peer Review مجرد كذبه وخدعه لا اكثر ولا اقل واداة اسيئ استخدام وحجة لاغلاق باب النقاش في اي موضوع تفشلون فيه :

Peer reviewing is a system of consencus, that used to be a handy tool for accepting important science advances. That has become a scam, and totally abused since the humanities in academia went bonkers, and totally overrun by the children of the lie. Now it is nothing more than a network of collegues who push the like button on eachothers thesis without sourcematerial, to push agendas. A way to change society by bipassing the scientific methods that are demanded. Like the new genders academia push, the infinite numbers of sexualities recognized, which I think are over 30 now in the US. Like sexual attraction to trees and cars, which is just nonsense. And so many genders that restaurants will have to start serving food on the streets, because the entire restaurant needs like 10 different bathrooms to accomodate all "genders". Stuff like that. And you do not need to be in the field you peer review. A psyologist can peer review a study about chemistry or powerplants. So basicly just friends asking their email list of work contacts, asking them to bluecheck their reports to get it approved. It is interesting to see who helps eachother like this.

You cannot peerr review faith. Nobody has Phds in it, not a science. The theological equivalent to a Phd would be bishops, priests and the pope. But academia do not accept that work as science. So impossible. And it is just a goto for atheists and leftist, when they ask for peer reviewed links. Just a popular catchphrase to shutdown conversations. Playacting being intellectual.